Given a page `/foo` and a subpage `/foo/bar`, if I add a link to `baz` to `/foo` and click on the link to create the page, the suggested location should be `/foo/baz` instead of `/baz`. The rationale is that presence of a sibling folder, or sibling pages (with `usefolders=0`) is a strong hint that we're at the root of a (sub-)hierarchy. > I think there's something to be said for consistency, even if it doesn't > make the best guess every time. It makes it more easy to learn when > you do need to change the location, and learn when default works. > > In your example, to get the foo/bar page created, you'd need to remember > to change the default when creating that subpage. But only for the first > subpage, after that it would get the default right. But who can remember if > a particular page has a subpage already? You end up having to check every > time anyway. Plus, you'd have to check every time you wanted to create "bar" > from "foo" that it didn't guess you meant "foo/bar". > > With the current simple default, you at least > know you don't need to check in that fairly common case, which seems like > a win over your suggestion. > > IMHO, what you really want is [[Moving_pages]]. :-) --[[Joey]] >> This sounds like WONTFIX to me? --[[smcv]] [[!tag wishlist done]]