[[!tag patch]]
> bump?
+
+>> I know I've looked at 88c6e2891593fd508701d728602515e47284180c
+>> before, and something about it just seemed wrong. Maybe it's
+>> the triviality of the sub, which it would seem to be easy to
+>> decide to refactor back into its one caller (which would reintroduce the
+>> bug). --[[Joey]]