similarity to internal pages

[ikiwiki.git] / doc / todo / auto_rebuild_on_template_change.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/todo/auto_rebuild_on_template_change.mdwn b/doc/todo/auto_rebuild_on_template_change.mdwn
index 2799842ed3bfccdb885db3393846d8e6a214e35c..2e4ba8e9a9d04e18bc81008b358a8504dbfa0b40 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/todo/auto_rebuild_on_template_change.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/auto_rebuild_on_template_change.mdwn
@@ -24,12 +24,25 @@ register dependencies on `page.tmpl`, `inlinepage.tmpl`, etc, as they're
 used. Although, having every page declare an explicit dep on `page.tmpl`
 is perhaps a bit much; might be better to implement a special case for that
 one. Also, having the templates be copied to `destdir` is not desirable.
+In a sense, these template would be like internal pages, except not wiki
+pages, but raw files.
 
-The risk is that a site might have `allowed_attachments` set to "templates/*"
-or "*.tmpl" something like that. I think such a configuration is the *only*
-risk, and it's unlikely enough that a NEWS warning should suffice.
+The risk is that a site might have `allowed_attachments` set to
+`templates/*` or `*.tmpl` something like that. I think such a configuration
+is the *only* risk, and it's unlikely enough that a NEWS warning should
+suffice.
 
 (This would also help to clear up the tricky disctinction between
 wikitemplates and in-wiki templates.)
 
 > But would this require that templates be parseable as wiki pages?  Because that would be a nuisance. --[[KathrynAndersen]]
+
+>> It would be better for them not to be rendered separately at all.
+>> --[[Joey]]  
+
+>>> I don't follow you. --[[KathrynAndersen]]
+
+>>>> If they don't render to output files, they clearly don't
+>>>> need to be treated as wiki pages. (They need to be treated
+>>>> as raw files anyway, because you don't want random users editing them 
+>>>> in the online editor.) --[[Joey]]