X-Git-Url: https://sipb.mit.edu/gitweb.cgi/ikiwiki.git/blobdiff_plain/335942c0ea3b3e0b3fa286592ffee55873c7f9a2..4a46e91147501cd621352e9a09e4a2f3e3621728:/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn b/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn
index 9382056da..2439cd65f 100644
--- a/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn
@@ -12,3 +12,11 @@ In our team internal wiki, we wish to impose a policy that all edits must have a
 > BTW, it wuld probably be better to validate against a `comment_regexp`,
 > so that when the evil admins notice that /.+/ is absurdly easy for users
 > to get around (by using " "), they can tighten it down. --[[Joey]]
+
+> Sorry for being dense, but I don't see a way to modify the template from within
+> a plugin, without providing a whole new template for editform, which obviously
+> isn't a workable solution. If the template was modified to allow overriding the
+> portion of the message in question, then I agree that a plugin couuld do the rest.
+> Thoughts appreciated :) --[[Dom]]
+
+> Yes, modifying the template is ok. --[[Joey]]