X-Git-Url: https://sipb.mit.edu/gitweb.cgi/ikiwiki.git/blobdiff_plain/447d3ae258070be5e421b17b2aef4fe80031583c..6f26e11bf061e37eab68c30f4c4c037625bd9c3f:/doc/bugs/login_page_should_note_cookie_requirement.mdwn diff --git a/doc/bugs/login_page_should_note_cookie_requirement.mdwn b/doc/bugs/login_page_should_note_cookie_requirement.mdwn index bd52f1c21..17ac12b34 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/login_page_should_note_cookie_requirement.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/login_page_should_note_cookie_requirement.mdwn @@ -7,6 +7,10 @@ At the moment, you go through the login shuffle and then are told that cookies a >> Very few websites break without cookies. Even fewer lose data. >> Can ikiwiki avoid being below average by default? --[MJR](http://mjr.towers.org.uk) +>>> Can we avoid engaging in hyperbole? (Hint: Your browser probably has a +>>> back button. Hint 2: A username/password does not count as "lost data". +>>> Hint 3: Now we're arguing, which is pointless.) --[[Joey]] + Even better would be to only display the cookie note as a warning if the login page doesn't receive a session cookie. > I considered doing this before, but it would require running the cgi once @@ -14,9 +18,22 @@ Even better would be to only display the cookie note as a warning if the login p > time to check if it took, which is both complicated and probably would > look bad. +>> Might this be possible client-side with javascript? A quick google suggests it is possible: +>> . MJR, want to try adding +>> that? -- [[Will]] + Best of all would be to use URL-based or hidden-field-based session tokens if cookies are not permitted. > This is not very doable since most of the pages the user browses are > static pages in a static location. ->> The pages that lose data without cookies (the edit pages, primarily) don't look static. Are they really? --[MJR](http://mjr.towers.org.uk) +>> The pages that lose data without cookies (the edit pages, primarily) +>> don't look static. Are they really? --[MJR](http://mjr.towers.org.uk) + +>>> As soon as you post an edit page, you are back to a static website. + +>>> It is impossible to get to an edit page w/o a cookie, unless +>>> anonymous edits are allowed, in which case it will save. No data loss. +>>> Since noone is working on this, and the nonsense above has pissed me +>>> off to the point that I will certianly never work on it, I'm going to +>>> close it. --[[Joey]] [[done]]