X-Git-Url: https://sipb.mit.edu/gitweb.cgi/ikiwiki.git/blobdiff_plain/6e330849d590a2ba0268c1308b3e13e8d67c4bab..3a807a87003b3176c24b3f9a3e7cacea30de4b7e:/doc/bugs/Checksum_errors_on_the_pristine-tar_branch.mdwn diff --git a/doc/bugs/Checksum_errors_on_the_pristine-tar_branch.mdwn b/doc/bugs/Checksum_errors_on_the_pristine-tar_branch.mdwn index e59a69720..471dad98c 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/Checksum_errors_on_the_pristine-tar_branch.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/Checksum_errors_on_the_pristine-tar_branch.mdwn @@ -41,6 +41,52 @@ The operation fails on these files with a "Checksum validation failed" error fro > complains, but the tarball is produced successfully. However, I do see actual > failures for 2.62 and 2.62.1, for instance. --[[smcv]] +> Yes, on Debian unstable I got failures on only old ones, but not in +> contiguous blocks: --[[Joey]] +> +> ikiwiki_2.20.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.30.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.31.1.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.46.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.47.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.48.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.49.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.50.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.51.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.62.1.tar.gz +> ikiwiki_2.62.tar.gz +> +> Probably what would help debug this problem is if someone can +> reproduce with one or more of the other ones that do **not** fail +> for me, pass `-dk` to pristine-tar, and send me a copy of its temp directory +> (joey@kitenet.net), and the versions of pristine-tar, tar, gzip. +> Then I can compare the good and bad recreated +> tarballs and identify the difference. Or pass them to the tar developers, +> who have helped before. +> +> The only cause that I can think of is that perhaps tar's output +> has changed compared with the version used to create those. The +> only tar output change I know of involved filenames that were +> exactly 100 bytes long -- and pristine-tar 1.11 works around that +> when run with tar 1.25-2 on Debian. FWIW, I am only seeing +> this in ikiwiki's pristine-tar info, not other packages'. +> (Checked all of debhelper's and alien's and etckeeper's +> and pristine-tar's tarballs.) --[[Joey]] +> +>> It looks as though I only get the same failures as you, so that's no help +>> (reassuring, though, since we're presumably both running recent Debian). +>> sunny256's failure cases might just result from the older tar and pristine-tar +>> on Ubuntu 10.04? --[[smcv]] + +>>> Yes, I can reproduce the same failures sunny256 saw using Debian oldstable. Once I +>>> upgrade pristine-tar and tar, it goes away, so I think it is the 100 +>>> byte filename bug affecting those. +>>> +>>> As to the ones we all see fail, I dunno what it is, but probably +>>> has to do with some kind of historical issue in the versions of +>>> pristine-tar/tar used to create them. We may never know what went wrong +>>> there. --[[Joey]] [[done]] + A complete output of the "pristine-tar checkout" of all files is stored on . For now, I'll download the `.tar.gz` from , or maybe install `ikiwiki_3.20110124_all.deb`. Would you recommend using that `.deb` file on Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS, or is it Debian-specific? -- [[sunny256]] 2011-02-21 08:42+0100 @@ -49,3 +95,18 @@ For now, I'll download the `.tar.gz` from generally been able to compile snapshots on Debian unstable and > install them onto Debian lenny (older than that Ubuntu release) > without modification. If in doubt, build it from source. --[[smcv]] + +> > The .deb file `ikiwiki_3.20110124_all.deb` from Debian unstable seems to +> > work great. I'm now the happy user of the newest stable version, yay. There +> > were some errors or warnings, though. This is the first one: + +> > > `You are overwriting a locally defined method (finished) with an accessor +> > > at /usr/lib/perl5/Moose/Meta/Attribute.pm line 570` + +> > Along with loads of other suspicious stuff. Have posted the whole output at +> > . I'll dig around a bit in the source to +> > see if there's something I need to worry about. It looks good so far. +> > -- [[sunny256]] 2011-02-24 20:27Z + +> > > Looks like a bug in [[!cpan Net::Amazon::S3::Client::Bucket]] or in something +> > > it uses, rather than in ikiwiki itself. --[[smcv]]