X-Git-Url: https://sipb.mit.edu/gitweb.cgi/ikiwiki.git/blobdiff_plain/a6e216c9746eb87d1a6226b05b702525c4f4160e..b522d8cddaa27d20eefbab762a33a3676ba0985c:/doc/bugs/maps_with_nested_directories_sometimes_make_ugly_lists.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/bugs/maps_with_nested_directories_sometimes_make_ugly_lists.mdwn b/doc/bugs/maps_with_nested_directories_sometimes_make_ugly_lists.mdwn
index d8a62311d..f66e2c0e5 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/maps_with_nested_directories_sometimes_make_ugly_lists.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/maps_with_nested_directories_sometimes_make_ugly_lists.mdwn
@@ -39,3 +39,22 @@ But it also doesn't work on the sitemap page: <http://adam.shand.net/ikidev/site
 This might be really simple, but I've been staring at it too long and it only looks like a bug to me. :-(   Any suggestions would be gratefully accepted. -- [[AdamShand]]
 
 > Okay, I think I've figured this out, it looks like ikiwiki behaves differently depending on the level of heirarchy.  I'll post the details once I'm sure.  -- [[AdamShand]]
+
+>> I managed to replicate the issue on my ikiwiki, and I believe it is a
+>> bug. The current upstream logic for going up/down by a level opens
+>> (and closes) the unnecessary lists that you are seeing. Although the
+>> resulting markup is semantically correct, it has superflous stuff
+>> that introduces whitespace issues at the very least.
+
+>> I have a [[patch]] up [on my git repo](http://git.oblomov.eu/ikiwiki/patch/55fa11e8a5fb351f9371533c758d8bd3eb9de245)
+>> that ought to fix the issue.
+
+>>> Wonderful, thank you very much for the help!  I've installed the patch and it's working great, but it looks like there a minor bug.  Sometimes it doesn't print the top/first map item.  Cheers, -- [[AdamShand]]
+>>>
+>>> <http://adam.shand.net/tmp/map-orig.jpg>   
+>>> <http://adam.shand.net/tmp/map-patched.jpg>   
+
+>>>> Thanks for testing. I managed to reproduce it and I adjusted the logic.
+>>>> An updated [[patch]] can be found [here](http://git.oblomov.eu/ikiwiki/patch/dcfb18b7989a9912ed9489f5ff15f871b6d8c24a)
+
+>>>>> Seems to work perfectly to me, thanks! -- [[AdamShand]]