X-Git-Url: https://sipb.mit.edu/gitweb.cgi/ikiwiki.git/blobdiff_plain/ac4a11ba50b4093bebe32d99c48c0de53ca414d8..8a8277faf8a084694745cfd20906733df46b4ff9:/doc/bugs/Can__39__t_create_root_page.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/bugs/Can__39__t_create_root_page.mdwn b/doc/bugs/Can__39__t_create_root_page.mdwn
index b56f3bddc..91c2eae60 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/Can__39__t_create_root_page.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/Can__39__t_create_root_page.mdwn
@@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ This type of page name (with leading slash) also gets created by the aggregate p
 > <current>/subdir/subpage, when a user clicks the "?" link to create
 > the missing page ; that's why I'm using absolute paths.
 >
+>> Totally agree, this had only not been addressed due to lack of time on
+>> my part. (I have about 50 ikiwiki things on my todo list.) --[[Joey]]
+>
 > Anyway, having the CGI consider invalid an otherwise valid wikilink
 > seems a bit weird to me, so I had a look to the code, and here is a
 > patch that should fix this issue ; I proceeded the only way I could
@@ -30,7 +33,7 @@ This type of page name (with leading slash) also gets created by the aggregate p
 	index 99cead6..23d9616 100644
 	--- a/IkiWiki/CGI.pm
 	+++ b/IkiWiki/CGI.pm
-	@@ -305,9 +305,11 @@ sub cgi_editpage ($$) { #{{{
+	@@ -305,9 +305,11 @@ sub cgi_editpage ($$) {
 	 	my $page=$form->field('page');
 	 	$page=possibly_foolish_untaint($page);
 	 	if (! defined $page || ! length $page ||
@@ -43,7 +46,7 @@ This type of page name (with leading slash) also gets created by the aggregate p
 	 
 	 	my $baseurl=$config{url}."/".htmlpage($page);
 	 	
-	@@ -425,6 +427,7 @@ sub cgi_editpage ($$) { #{{{
+	@@ -425,6 +427,7 @@ sub cgi_editpage ($$) {
 	 			    $from ne $form->field('from') ||
 	 			    file_pruned($from, $config{srcdir}) ||
 	 			    $from=~/^\// ||
@@ -52,4 +55,15 @@ This type of page name (with leading slash) also gets created by the aggregate p
 	 				@page_locs=$best_loc=$page;
 	 			}
 
-[[tag patch]]
+
+> [[Applied|done]]. BTW, I also accept full git changesets, if you like
+> having your name in commit logs. :-)
+
+>> Thanks. I'm considering setting up a public Git repository with topic branches, so that :
+
+>> - I can simply ask you to pull from there, next time
+>> - I have a tool to go on learning the beast (i.e. Git)
+
+>> -- intrigeri
+
+[[!tag patch]]