X-Git-Url: https://sipb.mit.edu/gitweb.cgi/ikiwiki.git/blobdiff_plain/bfe0d3f5c6671ccc26c510f5a07cc0deb926258d..53b76f7abb213907c0cfa6aa49e62d38c9bdf97b:/doc/todo/blogging.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/blogging.mdwn b/doc/todo/blogging.mdwn index 6ee9aaf5c..f9037b063 100644 --- a/doc/todo/blogging.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/blogging.mdwn @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ -- Add Discussion and Edit links at the bottom of each inlined post. - It would be possible to support rss enclosures for eg, podcasts, pretty easily. Here is the last of those items. Using the meta plugin you can give the appropriate @@ -87,3 +86,46 @@ that people wont use raw if they want to pod/vid/whatevercast? > podcast users use. :-) > --[[Joey]] + +I tested with amarok, and that also ignored the description. +I am thinking of those where you have a mixed feed, and people +using clients that ignore enclsures get pretty much a blank post, +with just the filename, and the html page, which also just displays +the filename. + +I don't think this is a big issue though, so I guess it's just which +you think is the cleaner interface. + +I have also added the first of your ideas as well (though you seem to have +removed it). It adds a parameter to inline `archive_after` which limits +showing full entries to that number. + + + +-- JamesWestby + +> I removed it because I don't really see the need for it anymore. +> The added complexity doesn't seem worth it, unless someone needs the +> features. --[[Joey]] + +And here is the updated podcast patch supporting any file type. + + + +-- JamesWestby + +And here is a patch for the remaining item. It adds links to the bottom of +inlined entries for edit and discuss (if they are enabled). It doesn't add +links for edit if the filetype is not known. + +The stylesheet should probably be done slightly better than I have. I just +added a bit of spacing as the links were too close to the date. I have no +skill in this area though. Perhaps you would like to use the list system +that you have for the links at the top. + + + +-- JamesWestby + +> Thanks! I did tweak the css a bit. Not totally happy with it, but pretty +> good I think. (I'll try to get to the other patches soon.) --[[Joey]]