X-Git-Url: https://sipb.mit.edu/gitweb.cgi/ikiwiki.git/blobdiff_plain/c629d790d81fff25b592db6dc17a5430e950da2d..8c6d363eb649a7bb136799b3a0070e332eadfaea:/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn b/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn
index 132fecaa5..da68b04c2 100644
--- a/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-[[tag wishlist]]
-[[tag patch]]
+[[!tag wishlist]]
+[[!tag patch]]
 
-In our team internal wiki, we wish to impose a policy that all edits must have a comment. Patch in [[debbug 450620]].
+In our team internal wiki, we wish to impose a policy that all edits must have a comment. Patch in [[!debbug 450620]].
 
 > Good idea! I also hate empty commit comments, but I know that it's also a matter
 > of human mentality. Of course, you can forbid users to commit empty comments,
@@ -17,4 +17,6 @@ In our team internal wiki, we wish to impose a policy that all edits must have a
 > a plugin, without providing a whole new template for editform, which obviously
 > isn't a workable solution. If the template was modified to allow overriding the
 > portion of the message in question, then I agree that a plugin couuld do the rest.
-> Thoughts appreciated :) --[[Dom]]
\ No newline at end of file
+> Thoughts appreciated :) --[[Dom]]
+
+> Yes, modifying the template is ok. --[[Joey]]