X-Git-Url: https://sipb.mit.edu/gitweb.cgi/ikiwiki.git/blobdiff_plain/dbf8358d6805fd81925dde1fd9ff3f10dc99fb77..4fbb2a5bd40b15253082ae30838fc138bf04cfd9:/doc/todo/applydiff_plugin.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/applydiff_plugin.mdwn b/doc/todo/applydiff_plugin.mdwn index b8ddcd6ce..d26b0dfe9 100644 --- a/doc/todo/applydiff_plugin.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/applydiff_plugin.mdwn @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -[[!tag wishlist]] +[[!tag wishlist done]] [[!toc ]] @@ -69,13 +69,15 @@ Also see [[joey]]'s idea on [[users/xma/discussion]], to allow (filtered) anonym > and use `parse_diff_tree` to get a list of the files changed. Then it > could determine if the changes were allowed. > -> To do that, it should perhaps first look at what unix user received the +> To do that, it should first look at what unix user received the > commit. That could be mapped directly to an ikiwiki user. This would -> typically be an unprivelidged user, but you might also want to set up -> separate users who have fewer limits on what they can push. OTOH, I'm not -> sure how to get this info in an ikiwiki wrapper.. the real and effective -> gid are already trampled. So maybe leave this out and always treat it as -> an anonymous edit from a non-logged in user? +> typically be an unprivelidged user (that was set up just to allow +> anonymous pushes), but you might also want to set up +> separate users who have fewer limits on what they can push. And, of +> course, pushes from the main user, who owns the wiki, would not be +> checked at all. So, let's say `$config{usermap}` is a hash, something +> like `{usera => "wikiusera", userb => "wikiuserb"}`, and pushes from +> users not in the hash are not checked. > > Then it seems like it would want to call `check_canedit` to test if an > edit to each changed page is allowed. Might also want to call @@ -93,3 +95,16 @@ Also see [[joey]]'s idea on [[users/xma/discussion]], to allow (filtered) anonym > Also, I've not verified that the objects have been recieved already when > whe pre-receive hook is called. Although the docs seem to say that is the > case. --[[Joey]] + +>> Update: The git pre-receive hook stuff is written, and seems to work. +>> I think it makes more sense than using diffs, and so think this todo +>> could probably be closed. +>> --[[Joey]] + +>>> I agree, closing this. I really prefer this solution to the one I was +>>> initially proposing. +>>> Is this pre-receive hook already enabled on ikiwiki.info? +>>> If not, do you plan to enable it at some point? +>>> --[[intrigeri]] + +>>>> [[news/git_push_to_this_wiki]] gave me the answer. Well done! --[[intrigeri]]