X-Git-Url: https://sipb.mit.edu/gitweb.cgi/ikiwiki.git/blobdiff_plain/f02df6477ec02e004c44cc6cf298f66c47920b07..888ff17819b330de63fa7e73709b0475b12111ca:/doc/todo/pagespec_expansions.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/pagespec_expansions.mdwn b/doc/todo/pagespec_expansions.mdwn index 111217948..3e8abbace 100644 --- a/doc/todo/pagespec_expansions.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/pagespec_expansions.mdwn @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ I can see why it might not be much of an improvement. :) --Ethan > Seems to me that ".." would be the natural thing to use, not "@". --[[Joey]] +>> I don't understand.. "a/b/.." matches a/b/c but not a/b/c/d ? That doesn't +>> seem natural to me at all. --Ethan + OK, I took a shot at implementing the changes. I was thinking about making pagespecs relative by default but I couldn't decide whether page `foo/bar` inlining `*` should match `foo/bar/*` or `foo/*`. @@ -57,14 +60,47 @@ and you can see it work at > as its third parameter. This will allow add_depends to add a > dependency on a pagespec that matches relative to the page. I made this > changes and it seems to work, new pages are noticed in updates. + +>> OK, I was kind of flying blind for a lot of those plugins. You would +>> know better than me. + > * `! $from` fails to match pages named "0" :-) + +>> I don't understand. How did you even get $from into the +>> translated pagespec? + > * '/./ matches any letter, not just "." :-) :-) + +>> Oof, thanks for catching that. + > * One other major problem. If you look at the doc/examples/blog/index.mdwn > I changed it to use relative globs like "./posts/*", but they didn't work, > because it looked for examples/blog/indexposts/* instead of > examples/blog/index/posts/*. And, of course, what I really expected it to > look for was examples/blog/posts/*. I think you may have made the wrong > choice about that, so I changed it to go the other way. What do you think? -> + +>> I could have sworn I made a change like that -- I was gonna make a call to +>> basename() or something .. wait, I might have decided not to, because it +>> would interfere with my index patch. Yeah, I guess my code was wrong. +>> Don't "nice patches" usually work? :) My test cases were mostly "./*", +>> so it slipped under the radar. + +>> As for what it should have done, that's much harder! My gut feeling is that +>> "a/b/c.mdwn" inlining `./*` wants `a/b/c/*` and not `a/b/*`, and this is +>> what I programmed for. I also feel that "a/b/c" inlining `./d/*` could go +>> either way. Ideally we'd check for both, maybe using bestlink? + +>> The issue might be confounded some by your use of an index page, and +>> ikiwiki doesn't have good support for those yet :) . +>> I think ideally your index page would be treated as inlining from +>> examples/blog/. To resolve this issue we should consider, for example: +>> clothes/pants inlines `./jeans/*` -- probably means clothes/pants/jeans +>> vacation/bermuda/blog inlines `./pics/*` -- probably vacation/bermuda/pics + > I've committed support for ./ to ikiwiki now, based on your patch. > --[[Joey]] + +>> Cool! I haven't played with it yet, but looking over the patch, I see that +>> you added another parameter to match_glob, which is an approach that didn't +>> occur to me. I like it, it's more flexible. --Ethan \ No newline at end of file