X-Git-Url: https://sipb.mit.edu/gitweb.cgi/ikiwiki.git/blobdiff_plain/f77e2078726124efc9ab87b28c20b1d004012fcd..4054f8d8ce0802b43e1c2c6f9cb71badbbcaf919:/doc/todo/ACL.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/todo/ACL.mdwn b/doc/todo/ACL.mdwn
index 827d4f6fa..57979385d 100644
--- a/doc/todo/ACL.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/ACL.mdwn
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Also see [[!debbug 443346]].
 >  defined in the wiki pages (although they could be).
 >* Given the previous two points, can't this be done with the `match_user()`
 > function defined by the [[plugins/attachment]] plugin (see the [[ikiwiki/pagespec/attachment]] pagespec info)
-> and the [[plugins/lockedit]] plugin (see [[page_locking]])?
+> and the [[plugins/lockedit]] plugin?
 >
 > For example, add the following to your config file:
 >
@@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ Also see [[!debbug 443346]].
 > would lock all pages unless you're john and editing a Discussion page.
 > It's a thought anyway :-).  -- [[Will]]
 
+>> Yes, writing per-user commit ACLs has become somewhat easier with recent
+>> features. Breaking `match_user` out of attachment, and making the
+>> lockedit plugin pass`user` and `ip` params when it calls `pagespec_match`
+>> would be sufficient. And [[done]], configurable via
+>> [[plugin/lockedit]]'s `locked_pages`. --[[Joey]]
+
 I am considering giving this a try, implementing it as a module.
 Here is how I see it:
 
@@ -63,3 +69,19 @@ Here is how I see it:
     <pre>
     \[[!acl user=* page=/subsite/* acl=/subsite/acl.mdwn]]
     </pre>
+
+Any idea when this is going to be finished?  If you want, I am happy to beta test.
+
+> It's already done, though that is sorta hidden in the above. :-)
+> Example of use to only allow two users to edit the tipjar page:
+>	locked_pages => 'tipjar and !(user(joey) or user(bob))',
+> --[[Joey]] 
+
+> > Thank you for the hint but I am being still confused (read: dense)...  What I am trying to do is this:
+
+> >  * No anonymous access.
+> >  * Logged in users can edit and create pages.
+> >  * Users can set who can edit their pages. 
+> >  * Some pages are only viewable by admins. 
+
+> > Is it possible?  If so how?...