]> sipb.mit.edu Git - ikiwiki.git/commitdiff
update
authorJoey Hess <joey@gnu.kitenet.net>
Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:57:39 +0000 (13:57 -0400)
committerJoey Hess <joey@gnu.kitenet.net>
Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:57:39 +0000 (13:57 -0400)
doc/todo/dependency_types.mdwn

index 1c2f579b359eca24e7bfb64c9b5ec94321fba57c..2bdf1d6a35b494b42fa25d53157b1146f24c8b5c 100644 (file)
@@ -552,22 +552,16 @@ operators. Currently, this turns into roughly:
 `FailReason() & SuccessReason(patch)`
 
 Let's say that the glob instead returns a HardFailReason, which when
 `FailReason() & SuccessReason(patch)`
 
 Let's say that the glob instead returns a HardFailReason, which when
-ANDed with another object, drops their influences. (But when ORed, combines
-them.) Fixes the above, but does it always work?
-
-"(bugs/* or link(patch)) and backlink(index)" =>
-`( HardFailReason() | SuccessReason(page) ) & SuccessReason(index)`` =>
-`SuccessReason(page & SuccessReason(index)` =>
-SuccessReason(page, index) => right
-
-"(bugs/* and link(patch)) or backlink(index)" =>
-`( HardFailReason() & SuccessReason(page) ) | SuccessReason(index)`` =>
-`HardFailReason() | SuccessReason(index)` =>
-`SuccessReason(index)` => right
-
-"!bugs/* and link(patch)" =>
-`HardFailReason() | SuccessReason(bugs/foo)` =>  
-`HardFailReason()` => right
+ANDed with another object, blocks their influences. (But when ORed,
+combines them.)
+
+Question: Are all pagespec terms that return reason objects w/o any
+influence info, suitable to block influence in this way? 
+
+To be suitable to block, a term should never change from failing to match a
+page to successfully matching it, unless that page is directly changed in a
+way that influences are not needed for ikiwiki to notice. But, if a term
+did not meet these criteria, it would have an influence. QED.
 
 #### Influence types
 
 
 #### Influence types