response

diff --git a/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn b/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn
index 57ab959853b902e6c35af04e88bffff0f47071e2..66a68032f6a31b4a1afe19e0ff816cfbd87bf1e8 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn
@@ -38,3 +38,10 @@ and a whitelist of OpenIDs in `locked_pages`...)
 >>>> Would I be able to do what I want with a local plugin that
 >>>> knows my auth requirements and abuses canedit -- e.g., if the page
 >>>> matches */Discussion, redirect to Signin form, else httpauth? --[[schmonz]]
+
+>>>>> If you wanted users to need to login with openid or passwordauth
+>>>>> for discussion pages, you could do that. That seems it would be
+>>>>> annoying for httpauth users (who were not current authed) though,
+>>>>> as they would then see the openid signin form. 
+>>>>> 
+>>>>> --[[Joey]]