From: Joey Hess Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 04:12:15 +0000 (-0400) Subject: improved fix for depends_simple_mixup X-Git-Url: https://sipb.mit.edu/gitweb.cgi/ikiwiki.git/commitdiff_plain/2b175d7c1fe997277800c0d501332e96de475c6d improved fix for depends_simple_mixup Avoid adding the page matched against as an influence for currently failing pagespec matches, while still adding any other influences. This avoids bloating depends_simple with lots of bogus influences when matching eg, "!link(done)". It's only necessary for the page being tested to be an influence of that if the page matches. --- diff --git a/IkiWiki.pm b/IkiWiki.pm index 0791e1e75..509f9ba2e 100644 --- a/IkiWiki.pm +++ b/IkiWiki.pm @@ -1818,10 +1818,12 @@ sub add_depends ($$;$) { foreach my $p (keys %pagesources) { my $r=$sub->($p, location => $page); my $i=$r->influences; + my $static=$r->influences_static; foreach my $k (keys %$i) { + next unless $r || $static || $k eq $page; $depends_simple{$page}{lc $k} |= $i->{$k}; } - last if $r->influences_static; + last if $static; } $depends{$page}{$pagespec} |= $deptype; @@ -2136,6 +2138,9 @@ sub pagespec_match_list ($$;@) { my $r=$sub->($p, %params, location => $page); error(sprintf(gettext("cannot match pages: %s"), $r)) if $r->isa("IkiWiki::ErrorReason"); + unless ($r) { + $r->remove_influence($p); + } $accum |= $r; if ($r) { push @matches, $p; @@ -2232,6 +2237,13 @@ sub merge_influences { } } +sub remove_influence { + my $this=shift; + my $torm=shift; + + delete $this->[1]{$torm}; +} + package IkiWiki::ErrorReason; our @ISA = 'IkiWiki::FailReason'; diff --git a/doc/bugs/depends_simple_mixup.mdwn b/doc/bugs/depends_simple_mixup.mdwn index 79bfa8bdc..a5910d02e 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/depends_simple_mixup.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/depends_simple_mixup.mdwn @@ -81,4 +81,8 @@ non-$page influences. Hmm, commit f2b3d1341447cbf29189ab490daae418fbe5d02d seems thuroughly wrong. So, what about influence info for other matches like `!author(foo)` etc? Currently, none is returned, but it should -be a content influence. (Backlink influence data is ok.) +be a content influence. (Backlink influence data seems ok.) + +---- + +[[done]] again!