From: http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~willu/ Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:36:11 +0000 (-0400) Subject: response X-Git-Url: https://sipb.mit.edu/gitweb.cgi/ikiwiki.git/commitdiff_plain/83826b39cfefd2588da09ca427d48f11a92ea8c0 response --- diff --git a/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn b/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn index 707790a75..6e55e46af 100644 --- a/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn @@ -331,6 +331,8 @@ account all comments above (which doesn't mean it is above reproach :) ). --[[W >>> it shouldn't (but I haven't verified that really happens). >>> That could certianly be a show-stopper. --[[Joey]] +>>>> I think this can happen in the new closure based code. I don't think this could happen in the old code. -- [[Will]] + >>>> Even if that works, this is a good argument for having a syntactic difference between named pagespecs and normal pages. >>>> If you're joining two pagespecs with 'or', you don't want a named pagespec in the first part overriding a page name in the >>>> second part. Oh, and I assume 'or' has the right operator precedence that "a and b or c" is "(a and b) or c", and not "a and (b or c)" -- [[Will]]