From: Joey Hess Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:06:04 +0000 (-0400) Subject: web commit by https://id.mayfirst.org/jamie/ X-Git-Url: https://sipb.mit.edu/gitweb.cgi/ikiwiki.git/commitdiff_plain/9bba193234d842cd45119bc910035725a7599268?hp=5be031b787946daaa68f20e2e4ea238cd5865fdf web commit by https://id.mayfirst.org/jamie/ --- diff --git a/doc/todo/Set_arbitrary_date_to_be_used_by_calendar_plugin.mdwn b/doc/todo/Set_arbitrary_date_to_be_used_by_calendar_plugin.mdwn index 7ce98aff7..15b46c896 100644 --- a/doc/todo/Set_arbitrary_date_to_be_used_by_calendar_plugin.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/Set_arbitrary_date_to_be_used_by_calendar_plugin.mdwn @@ -27,13 +27,20 @@ That date will be used instead of the post creation time when displaying the cal >> the page creation time - which is useful and important information in its own right >> - and be able to generate a calendar with links to particular posts that will show >> up on the calendar based on an arbitrary date. Perhaps this should be re-considered ->> as a separate plugin? +>> as a separate plugin? --[[Jamie]] >>> I think it makes sense to have only one calendar, if possible. >>> I think your event stuff is fine, the only thing we might want to add >>> is a config option for the calendar, to control whether it looks at the >>> event date, or the creation date. --[[Joey]] +>>>> Ok - I can work on that. One question - the existing calendar module has it's own +>>>> functions for building an html display of a calendar. HTML::CalendarMonth seems to +>>>> provide that functionality. My instincts are to rip out the code in the calendar plugin +>>>> and use the existing module. On the other hand, that creates added dependencies. +>>>> Suggestions anyone? --[[Jamie]] + + --- calendar.pm.orig 2008-06-24 22:36:09.000000000 -0400 +++ calendar.pm 2008-06-24 22:51:11.000000000 -0400 @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@