From: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlqWSY9PNYRysA9vrU-JiQh7-s7q6SOcIE <Fergus@web>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:14:31 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: Respond to "proper patch" request from Joey (i.e. apology)
X-Git-Url: https://sipb.mit.edu/gitweb.cgi/ikiwiki.git/commitdiff_plain/d3dbb70fabe3cce3cda21a567eec62fc58f73ef5

Respond to "proper patch" request from Joey (i.e. apology)
---

diff --git a/doc/todo/allow_TMPL__95__LOOP_in_template_directives.mdwn b/doc/todo/allow_TMPL__95__LOOP_in_template_directives.mdwn
index 6d0bd0971..890c4cf4b 100644
--- a/doc/todo/allow_TMPL__95__LOOP_in_template_directives.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/allow_TMPL__95__LOOP_in_template_directives.mdwn
@@ -14,6 +14,20 @@ rather limited way.
 > the form of a patch that is reviewable, not a gratuitous rewrite.
 > --[[Joey]] 
 
+>> Yes, my apologies for that.  The two worker functions `mktmpl_hash`
+and `proc_tmpl_hash` are new.  The `preprocess` function then starts
+by arranging the parameters into an array.  This array is passed to the
+`mktmpl_hash` and it creates a hash, suitable for passing into the
+HTML::Template directly.  The `proc_tmpl_hash` then walks the hash
+structure and processes the parameters.
+
+>> I know ... you weren't looking for an explanation, just a patch
+... totally understand.  Point I'm trying to make, it's a 90% re-write
+anyway (and my `style(8)` will probably piss most people off).
+
+>> Anyway, would love to contribute so will try to get to doing this
+"correctly" and post as a patch.
+
 I would, personally, only use this feature for very basic loops
 and, although nested loops *might* be possible (with a little
 more tinkering) it think any attempt would be better served by