From: http://dtrt.org/ <http://dtrt.org/@web>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:06:21 +0000 (-0500)
Subject: Workaround and possible cause
X-Git-Url: https://sipb.mit.edu/gitweb.cgi/ikiwiki.git/commitdiff_plain/dd4dff03506c5c8f9dee1fa59548e4e653bb0053

Workaround and possible cause
---

diff --git a/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn b/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn
index e8befe8d5..6357acdee 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn
@@ -26,3 +26,17 @@ If I instead include them using creation_year in the pagespec, they are ordered
 <http://alcopop.org/~jon/repro2/> contains the src used to reproduce this, the precise ikiwiki invocation (inside Makefile) and the results (dest).
 
 -- [[users/Jon]]
+
+
+> On Ikiwiki 2.53.3 (Debian Lenny), my inlines are also sorted using mtime
+> by default -- despite what the [[documentation|/ikiwiki/directive/inline]]
+> says -- but setting the supposed default sort order manually produces the
+> correct results.  For example, the following inline sorts my blog
+> entires using their meta date or ctime:
+> 
+>     inline pages="blog/*" show="10" sort="age"
+> 
+> I'll try to look at the code this weekend and see if age is really the
+> default sort order.
+> 
+> -- [David A. Harding](http://dtrt.org), 2008-12-20