From 1a163a568ca755749cfba74f3b17a6ef1b8ba504 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://cgray.myopenid.com/" Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 22:38:20 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] --- ...be_more_selective_about_running_hooks.mdwn | 20 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/be_more_selective_about_running_hooks.mdwn diff --git a/doc/todo/be_more_selective_about_running_hooks.mdwn b/doc/todo/be_more_selective_about_running_hooks.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0c8e0b090 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/be_more_selective_about_running_hooks.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +[[!template id=gitbranch branch=chrismgray/exclusive-hooks author="[[chrismgray]]"]] + +Sometimes plugins register a function with `hook`, but they only want +the function called with the content that they know how to deal with. +Normally, this means that they call `pagetype` first thing in the +function, determine if they know how to deal with the content, and +only do anything if they do. + +This is a bit wasteful in itself, but for external plugins, it's +really bad. For functions like `scan` and `linkify`, where the entire +page is sent back and forth over `stdout` and `stdin`, it really slows +things down. + +Thus, I propose that there be a new optional parameter to `hook` that +tells it that the function should only be called for files whose type +is the same as the id of the plugin calling `hook`. I have called +this parameter `exclusive` in my branch, but this might not be the +best name. + +[[!tag patch]] -- 2.45.0