From 238e8b95a5b084e7131d3314b78419b9404cba4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 15:08:12 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] convert rcs_revert to only stage the reversion --- IkiWiki.pm | 4 ++-- IkiWiki/Plugin/git.pm | 13 ++++--------- IkiWiki/Plugin/recentchanges.pm | 13 +++++++++---- doc/plugins/write.mdwn | 10 ++++------ doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn | 4 ---- 5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/IkiWiki.pm b/IkiWiki.pm index 269647eb4..faf4af5c7 100644 --- a/IkiWiki.pm +++ b/IkiWiki.pm @@ -1941,11 +1941,11 @@ sub rcs_receive () { $hooks{rcs}{rcs_receive}{call}->(); } -sub rcs_preprevert (@) { +sub rcs_preprevert ($) { $hooks{rcs}{rcs_preprevert}{call}->(@_); } -sub rcs_revert (@) { +sub rcs_revert ($) { $hooks{rcs}{rcs_revert}{call}->(@_); } diff --git a/IkiWiki/Plugin/git.pm b/IkiWiki/Plugin/git.pm index 3ccaa446a..996ab6fba 100644 --- a/IkiWiki/Plugin/git.pm +++ b/IkiWiki/Plugin/git.pm @@ -846,19 +846,14 @@ sub rcs_preprevert (@) { [git_parse_changes(git_commit_info($rev, 1))]); } -sub rcs_revert (@) { - # Try to revert the given patch; returns undef on _success_. - my %params = @_; - my $rev = $params{rev}; +sub rcs_revert ($) { + # Try to revert the given rev; returns undef on _success_. + my $rev = $shift; if (run_or_non('git', 'revert', '--no-commit', $rev)) { - debug "Committing revert for patch '$rev'."; - rcs_commit_staged(message => - sprintf(gettext("This reverts commit %s"), $rev), @_); + return undef; } else { - # No idea what is actually getting reverted, so all we can - # do is say we failed. run_or_die('git', 'reset', '--hard'); return sprintf(gettext("Failed to revert commit %s"), $rev); } diff --git a/IkiWiki/Plugin/recentchanges.pm b/IkiWiki/Plugin/recentchanges.pm index 439241b93..44c981548 100644 --- a/IkiWiki/Plugin/recentchanges.pm +++ b/IkiWiki/Plugin/recentchanges.pm @@ -101,12 +101,17 @@ sub sessioncgi ($$) { if ($form->submitted eq 'Revert' && $form->validate) { IkiWiki::checksessionexpiry($q, $session, $q->param('sid')); IkiWiki::disable_commit_hook(); - my $r = IkiWiki::rcs_revert( - session => $session, - rev => $rev); + my $r = IkiWiki::rcs_revert($rev); + if (! defined $r) { # success + rcs_commit_staged( + message => sprintf(gettext("This reverts commit %s"), $rev), + session => $session, + rev => $rev, + ); + } IkiWiki::enable_commit_hook(); - if ($r) { + if (defined $r) { die "Revert '$rev' failed."; } else { diff --git a/doc/plugins/write.mdwn b/doc/plugins/write.mdwn index 3eade34ee..dbbe83851 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/write.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/write.mdwn @@ -1201,16 +1201,14 @@ Like `rcs_receive`, it should do whatever sanity checks are appropriate for the RCS to limit changes to safe changes, and die if a change would be unsafe to revert. -#### `rcs_revert(@)` +#### `rcs_revert($)` This is called by the revert web interface. It is passed a named parameter rev that is the RCS-specific change ID to revert. -Addition named parameters: `message`, and `session` (optional). - -It should try to revert the specified rev, which includes committing -the reversion, and returns undef on _success_ and an error message -on failure. +It should try to revert the specified rev, and leave the reversion staged +so `rcs_commit_staged` will complete it. It should return undef on _success_ +and an error message on failure. ### PageSpec plugins diff --git a/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn b/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn index 7cb412f79..784b72e05 100644 --- a/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn @@ -71,10 +71,6 @@ Peter Gammie has done an initial implementation of the above. >>> to: --[[Joey]] >>>> Please change the git pointer above, then. I will work on your branch. -- [[peteg]] ->>> * Would it be better for `rcs_revert` to not commit, and ->>> `rcs_commit_staged` to then be used? This would work for git, but ->>> maybe other RCSs would be problimatic. It would simplifiy the ->>> interface and allow for future mulitple-revert interfaces. >>> * I quite don't understand why one caller of `git_parse_changes` >>> needs it to chdir, and not the other one. It's running >>> in the same git repo either way, and git doesn't need -- 2.44.0