From 5813066cdccb6b5db23624ead63a5b103284218e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: joey Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:49:17 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] web commit by http://ethan.betacantrips.com/: respones --- doc/todo/pagespec_expansions.mdwn | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/todo/pagespec_expansions.mdwn b/doc/todo/pagespec_expansions.mdwn index 9915d8b3b..0ac2d8e3c 100644 --- a/doc/todo/pagespec_expansions.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/pagespec_expansions.mdwn @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ I can see why it might not be much of an improvement. :) --Ethan >>> Ah.. in that case, why not use "a/b/* and !a/b/*/*" ? No need for a new >>> symbol. --[[Joey]] +>>>> I know it's not necessary, but it would be helpful. --Ethan + OK, I took a shot at implementing the changes. I was thinking about making pagespecs relative by default but I couldn't decide whether page `foo/bar` inlining `*` should match `foo/bar/*` or `foo/*`. @@ -114,6 +116,12 @@ and you can see it work at >>> of deeply nested subdirs. >>> --[[Joey]] +>>>> Context-dependence was my conclusion too. My feeling is that inlining +>>>> in a subdirectory of the current page is more common, but I don't +>>>> really know. However, I think the changes as written should work OK +>>>> with my index patch and allowing inlining from a/b/c/, so I'm +>>>> satisfied. --Ethan + > I've committed support for ./ to ikiwiki now, based on your patch. > --[[Joey]] -- 2.45.0