From 5c954cdf5e99515b1cabc51ada6cfe19f10f23ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://id.koumbit.net/anarcat" Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:14:04 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] sign this post --- doc/todo/lucene_search_engine.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/todo/lucene_search_engine.mdwn b/doc/todo/lucene_search_engine.mdwn index bac9f9130..6b41d6668 100644 --- a/doc/todo/lucene_search_engine.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/lucene_search_engine.mdwn @@ -1 +1 @@ -There are [some issue](http://www.branchable.com/bugs/Exception:_Cannot_open_tables_at_consistent_revisions_at___47__usr__47__lib__47__perl5__47__Search__47__Xapian__47__WritableDatabase.pm_line_41./#comment-c159ea3f9be35fcd9ed0eeedb162e816) with the current search engine. Sometimes the database gets corrupted and it's not very good at weighting say, the title against the content. For example, [searching for pagespec](http://ikiwiki.info/ikiwiki.cgi?P=pagespec) in this wiki doesn't lead to the [[ikiwiki/pagespec]] page in the first page... but in the third page. In [[different_search_engine]], there was the idea of using Lucene - is there any reason why we should have both, or at least let lucene live in contrib? +There are [some issue](http://www.branchable.com/bugs/Exception:_Cannot_open_tables_at_consistent_revisions_at___47__usr__47__lib__47__perl5__47__Search__47__Xapian__47__WritableDatabase.pm_line_41./#comment-c159ea3f9be35fcd9ed0eeedb162e816) with the current search engine. Sometimes the database gets corrupted and it's not very good at weighting say, the title against the content. For example, [searching for pagespec](http://ikiwiki.info/ikiwiki.cgi?P=pagespec) in this wiki doesn't lead to the [[ikiwiki/pagespec]] page in the first page... but in the third page. In [[different_search_engine]], there was the idea of using Lucene - is there any reason why we should have both, or at least let lucene live in contrib? --[[anarcat]] -- 2.45.0