From 9d4331bd1c82769679d5bd640599d7afdd9c9734 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://kerravonsen.dreamwidth.org/" Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 22:01:17 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] more flexible, perhaps? --- doc/todo/CSS_classes_for_links.mdwn | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/todo/CSS_classes_for_links.mdwn b/doc/todo/CSS_classes_for_links.mdwn index 8abe49827..af1093f75 100644 --- a/doc/todo/CSS_classes_for_links.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/CSS_classes_for_links.mdwn @@ -117,3 +117,22 @@ I find CSS3 support still spotty... Here are some notes on how to do this in Ik >>>> applied. One would need to write tests running against the code >>>> with all plugins enabled, all templates put to work, in order to >>>> ensure consistency is maintained. --[[intrigeri]] + +----- +If you're going to be patching htmmllink anyway, might I suggest something more flexible, like being able to configure the link format? +(Yes, PmWiki allows this, that's where I got the idea) +That is, rather than having "?%s'); + return sprintf($format, + cgiurl(do => "create", page => lc($link), from => $lpage), + $linktext); + +I admit, I've been wanting something like this for a long time, because I dislike the existing createlink format... + +--[[KathrynAndersen]] -- 2.44.0