From 9f00692a798888b9cc9edb30a961c6418efba39b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:37:55 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] response --- doc/todo/auto_rebuild_on_template_change.mdwn | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/todo/auto_rebuild_on_template_change.mdwn b/doc/todo/auto_rebuild_on_template_change.mdwn index 2799842ed..cde19700c 100644 --- a/doc/todo/auto_rebuild_on_template_change.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/auto_rebuild_on_template_change.mdwn @@ -25,11 +25,15 @@ used. Although, having every page declare an explicit dep on `page.tmpl` is perhaps a bit much; might be better to implement a special case for that one. Also, having the templates be copied to `destdir` is not desirable. -The risk is that a site might have `allowed_attachments` set to "templates/*" -or "*.tmpl" something like that. I think such a configuration is the *only* -risk, and it's unlikely enough that a NEWS warning should suffice. +The risk is that a site might have `allowed_attachments` set to +`templates/*` or `*.tmpl` something like that. I think such a configuration +is the *only* risk, and it's unlikely enough that a NEWS warning should +suffice. (This would also help to clear up the tricky disctinction between wikitemplates and in-wiki templates.) > But would this require that templates be parseable as wiki pages? Because that would be a nuisance. --[[KathrynAndersen]] + +>> It would be better for them not to be rendered separately at all. +>> --[[Joey]] -- 2.45.0