From a23d3b6547b80064f8e9af94076aa43798cf6558 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawn1lGvpPZ8dpuLSPLPa-jqpMef2KqeB1qI" Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 23:50:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] --- .../link_to_an_image_inside_the_wiki_without_inlining_it.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/forum/link_to_an_image_inside_the_wiki_without_inlining_it.mdwn b/doc/forum/link_to_an_image_inside_the_wiki_without_inlining_it.mdwn index 3b19bab15..53544e2c4 100644 --- a/doc/forum/link_to_an_image_inside_the_wiki_without_inlining_it.mdwn +++ b/doc/forum/link_to_an_image_inside_the_wiki_without_inlining_it.mdwn @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ Any hints? --[[jerojasro]] >>> >>> I can help you bang that plugin into shape if need be. --[[Joey]] ->>>> both my plugin and your suggestion yield broken html links when inlining the page (although propably that's what is expected from your suggestion (`[]()`)) +>>>> both my plugin and your suggestion yield broken html links when inlining the page (although probably that's what is expected from your suggestion (`[]()`)) >>>> >>>> I thought using the `bestlink` function would take care of that, but alas, it doesn't. >>>> Get the "plugin" [here](http://devnull.li/~jerojasro/files/linktoimgonly.pm), see the broken -- 2.44.0