From a4697df3e79780f472eee75681d208d7013cbb33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:10:08 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] web commit by https://brian.may.myopenid.com/ --- doc/bugs/relative_links.mdwn | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/bugs/relative_links.mdwn b/doc/bugs/relative_links.mdwn index 207982c43..df203c651 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/relative_links.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/relative_links.mdwn @@ -5,9 +5,17 @@ It looks like all links in websites are absolute paths, this has some limitation It would be good if relative paths could be used instead, so the transport method isn't changed unless specifically requested. -Brian May +-- Brian May > Er, which absolute links are you talking about? If you view the source > to this page, you'll find links such as "../favicon.ico", "../style.css", > "../../", and "../". The only absolute links are to CGIs and the w3c DTD. > --[[Joey]] + +>> Something weird going on here, most of the links *are* relative. Maybe I was just too rushed. However there are still problems: + +>> Links at the top of the edit page; they are absolute (understandably). e.g. at the top of this page there is the header "ikiwiki/ editing bugs/relative links" where ikiwiki is an absolute link to the top of the page. + +>> If I push cancel on the edit page, I end up at http://..., although I am not sure how this occurs. + +>> -- Brian May -- 2.44.0