From bea828a2f6b455c46f2b5d6c16805958a2e3412a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/" Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:30:52 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] doesn't field+template already cover this? --- doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..851ccf960 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +Is this actually necessary? Doesn't the combination of [[plugins/template]] +with [[plugins/contrib/field]]'s `pagetemplate` hook provide the same +functionality? I suppose one missing thing is that `ftemplate` looks in +the "system" templates directories, not just in the wiki, but that +seems orthogonal (and might even be a good enhancement to `template`). +--[[smcv]] -- 2.44.0