From d8ab913061a60be86ca7ee8f3f7ffb76cb712377 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "https://id.koumbit.net/anarcat" <https://id.koumbit.net/anarcat@web>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 19:57:02 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] ask for bold terms

---
 doc/bugs/definition_lists_should_be_bold.mdwn | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/bugs/definition_lists_should_be_bold.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/bugs/definition_lists_should_be_bold.mdwn b/doc/bugs/definition_lists_should_be_bold.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a6597a45c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/definition_lists_should_be_bold.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Definition lists do not look great here...
+
+Here is an example.
+
+<dl>
+<dt>this is a term</dt>
+<dd>and this is its definition.</dd>
+</dl>
+
+(This wiki doesn't support Markdown's extended definition lists, but still, this is valid markup.)
+
+I believe `<dt>` should be made bold. I have added this to my `local.css`, and I would hate to add this all the time forever:
+
+    /* definition lists look better with the term in bold */
+    dt
+    {
+        font-weight: bold;
+    }
+
+:) How does that look? I can provide a patch for the base wiki if you guys really want... ;) -- [[anarcat]]
-- 
2.45.0