From da712491adf101f4610636d43afca210859dbf2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: sajolida Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:29:22 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] --- ..._all_comments_are_listed_by___33__map_or___33__inline.mdwn | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/bugs/Not_all_comments_are_listed_by___33__map_or___33__inline.mdwn b/doc/bugs/Not_all_comments_are_listed_by___33__map_or___33__inline.mdwn index ce083de2e..08953db5d 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/Not_all_comments_are_listed_by___33__map_or___33__inline.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/Not_all_comments_are_listed_by___33__map_or___33__inline.mdwn @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ While working on our forum I was surprised to see that some of the comments were >> Most does but not all. For example, none of the comments of this thread >> appears in the RSS, even though they should according to the « 25 most >> recent items » criteria: ->> --[[sajolida]] +>> --sajolida Then I found out that a map directive such as `!map pages="forum/* or comment(forum/*)"` was bringing a weird result too. The output is a map @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ with quite a few broken links. > or a create link because these are not true wiki pages. --[[Joey]] >> So I don't understand why 90 % of the comments are linked well and 10 % ->> are broken links. Why does this map behave differently for only a few comments? --[[sajolida]] +>> are broken links. Why does this map behave differently for only a few comments? --sajolida Plus, some broken links in the map do match the comments missing on the RSS feed but some others do not. -- 2.44.0