From e511073db7bb5d217d76f212e8967b335a7be695 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: spalax Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:57:08 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Comment --- doc/todo/concatenating_or_compiling_CSS.mdwn | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/todo/concatenating_or_compiling_CSS.mdwn b/doc/todo/concatenating_or_compiling_CSS.mdwn index ed3f2e846..e0715e730 100644 --- a/doc/todo/concatenating_or_compiling_CSS.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/concatenating_or_compiling_CSS.mdwn @@ -108,3 +108,18 @@ extension would have to be locked-down. Perhaps it's better to implement this without that feature initially. --[[smcv]] + +> Although I understand the need to improve CSS inclusion, I wonder why you are +> proposing concatenating CSS rather than including them as several ` type="text/css" href="FILE.css" rel="stylesheet">` lines +> in the header: unless I am missing something, I see this as far more simpler +> than concatenating them. +> +> This would imply that a template variable `CSS` is added to the page +> template, to be filled with those lines. +> +> Whatever solution is used, I agree that such a thing would be useful: +> adding CSS (rather than replacing the existing one) should be easier. +> +> -- [[Louis|spalax]] + -- 2.45.0