Merge branch 'ready/imgforpdf-and-more'

[ikiwiki.git] / doc / plugins / contrib / ftemplate / discussion.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn
index de4b35ef01b272d713b31f535107bc46dc2315a9..1e0bca5d86d570aef518e9ab989be83f0cd95677 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn
@@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ or something).
 >> uses `HTML::Template` but *doesn't* run `pagetemplate` hooks?
 >>
 >> It just seems strange to me that `field` needs to have its own
->> of `template` (this), its own variant of `inline` (`report`),
+>> variant of `template` (this), its own variant of `inline` (`report`),
 >> and so on - I'd tend to lean more towards having `field`
 >> enhance the existing plugins. I'm not an ikiwiki committer,
 >> mind... Joey, your opinion would be appreciated! --[[smcv]]
 
+>>> I did it that way basically because I needed the functionality ASAP, and I didn't want to step on anyone's toes, so I made them as separate plugins.  If Joey wants to integrate the functionality into IkiWiki proper, I would be very happy, but I don't want to put pressure on him. --[[KathrynAndersen]]
+
 Another missing thing is that `ftemplate` looks in
 the "system" templates directories, not just in the wiki, but that
 seems orthogonal (and might be a good enhancement to `template` anyway).
@@ -27,6 +29,5 @@ seems orthogonal (and might be a good enhancement to `template` anyway).
 
 > Yes, I added that because I wanted the option of not having to make all my templates work as wiki pages also. --[[KathrynAndersen]]
 
->> Yeah, that's something that annoys me about `template` too. I've
->> opened a todo: [[todo/user-defined_templates_outside_the_wiki]].
->> --s
+>> Joey has added support for
+>> [[todo/user-defined_templates_outside_the_wiki]] now. --s