more changelog and bug-closing

[ikiwiki.git] / doc / bugs / __91____91____33__inline_postform__61__no__93____93___doesn__39__t_disable_it.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/bugs/__91____91____33__inline_postform__61__no__93____93___doesn__39__t_disable_it.mdwn b/doc/bugs/__91____91____33__inline_postform__61__no__93____93___doesn__39__t_disable_it.mdwn
index 70deda2ab79c03e1dea280504451306ea5dfb35a..7b97b40b3be9260386d8cefd8a4436d7a8c59f45 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/bugs/__91____91____33__inline_postform__61__no__93____93___doesn__39__t_disable_it.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/__91____91____33__inline_postform__61__no__93____93___doesn__39__t_disable_it.mdwn
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+[[!tag patch users/smcv/ready]]
+[[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/ready/postform-no
+author="[[Simon McVittie|smcv]]"
+browse=http://git.pseudorandom.co.uk/smcv/ikiwiki.git/shortlog/refs/heads/ready/postform-no]]
+
 The [[ikiwiki/directive/inline]] directive generates a form if
 it has either rootpage, or postform with a "yes-like" value. This
 means that
@@ -9,4 +14,11 @@ mentioning rootpage there is useless).
 
 See also [[forum/How_to_disable_"Add_a_new_post_titled:"_submission_form?]].
 
+My `ready/postform-no` branch also contains a trivial regression test for
+`inline`. So far the only thing it really tests is that this bug was fixed,
+not the actual inlining of pages, but it's a start.
+
 --[[smcv]]
+
+>> this looks simple, straightforward and good to me --[[chrysn]]
+>>> [[merged|done]] --[[smcv]]