proof of concept implementation of static recentchanges

[ikiwiki.git] / doc / todo / latex.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/todo/latex.mdwn b/doc/todo/latex.mdwn
index 5367ffc5f2bcf80cfd9cae019b5b2ff408b13960..01d927552850db2306ac3c29179c61e6cd35676b 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/todo/latex.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/latex.mdwn
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 How about a plugin adding a
 How about a plugin adding a

-[[preprocessor_directive|preprocessordirective]] to render some given LaTeX
+[[preprocessor_directive|ikiwiki/preprocessordirective]] to render some given LaTeX

 and include it in the page?  This could either render the LaTeX as a PNG via
 [[debpkg dvipng]] and include the resulting image in the page, or perhaps
 render via [HeVeA](http://pauillac.inria.fr/~maranget/hevea/index.html),
 and include it in the page?  This could either render the LaTeX as a PNG via
 [[debpkg dvipng]] and include the resulting image in the page, or perhaps
 render via [HeVeA](http://pauillac.inria.fr/~maranget/hevea/index.html),


@@ -167,36 +167,49 @@ Okay, the last version of the tex plugin for ikiwiki can be downloaded [here](ht
 > fixed a bug (the first time it was run, it tried to write the png file
 > before the teximages/ directory existed) and checked the result in.
 > 
 > fixed a bug (the first time it was run, it tried to write the png file
 > before the teximages/ directory existed) and checked the result in.
 > 

-> Can you please flesh out [[plugins/tex]] with
+> Can you please flesh out [[plugins/teximg]] with

 > whatever documentation people who know tex will expect to see?
 > whatever documentation people who know tex will expect to see?

+

 Okay, I'll fill this up today I think with information about the plugin
 
 Okay, I'll fill this up today I think with information about the plugin
 

->
+Done. Is that docu fine with you?
+
+>> Perhaps add some documentation about the kind of tex code that can be
+>> used, or a link to some documentation so people who don't know latex
+>> well can figure this out?
+

 > Also, please review my changes. In particular, I changed the @badthings
 > array to use qr//, which is much clearer, but it needs to be tested that
 > I didn't break the checking code when I did it. It would be nice to write
 > a test case that tries to feed it bad code and makes sure it rejects it.
 > Also, please review my changes. In particular, I changed the @badthings
 > array to use qr//, which is much clearer, but it needs to be tested that
 > I didn't break the checking code when I did it. It would be nice to write
 > a test case that tries to feed it bad code and makes sure it rejects it.

+
+I'll test this now on my server. I'll report here later.
+Okay, checked. it works fine. My blacklist tests were successfull.
+

 >
 > Does it really make sense to have an alt tag for the image
 > that contains the tex code? Will that make any sense when browsing
 > without images?
 >
 > Does it really make sense to have an alt tag for the image
 > that contains the tex code? Will that make any sense when browsing
 > without images?

+

 Mh.. For people who know latex very well this would be enough to imagine how the image would look like. 
 This are of course the minority of people (but I guess also the minority of people are using non-gui browsers).
 
 
 Mh.. For people who know latex very well this would be enough to imagine how the image would look like. 
 This are of course the minority of people (but I guess also the minority of people are using non-gui browsers).
 
 

-> 
+

 > I'm thinking about renameing the preprocessor directive to teximg.
 > \[[teximg code="" alt="foo"]] makes sense.. Would it make sense to rename
 > the whole plugin, or do you think that other tex stuff should go in this
 > same plugin?
 
 > I'm thinking about renameing the preprocessor directive to teximg.
 > \[[teximg code="" alt="foo"]] makes sense.. Would it make sense to rename
 > the whole plugin, or do you think that other tex stuff should go in this
 > same plugin?
 

-I'll think over this until I'm at work ;)
+I'll think over this until I'm at work ;) Only for rendering images... not for generating .tex files .../wiki/
+the name is all the same i think. If you like teximg better than switch :)
+

 
 

->

 > Note: I removed the style= attribute, since as I've told you, the
 > htmlsanitizer strips those since they can be used to insert javascript. I
 > put in a class=teximage instead; the style sheet could be modified to
 > style that, if you want to send a patch for that.
 > Note: I removed the style= attribute, since as I've told you, the
 > htmlsanitizer strips those since they can be used to insert javascript. I
 > put in a class=teximage instead; the style sheet could be modified to
 > style that, if you want to send a patch for that.

+

 Ah yes.. sorry forgot to update the plugin in my public_html folder %-). This was my last change in this plugin :) Sorry.
 
 
 Ah yes.. sorry forgot to update the plugin in my public_html folder %-). This was my last change in this plugin :) Sorry.