proof of concept implementation of static recentchanges

[ikiwiki.git] / doc / todo / latex.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/todo/latex.mdwn b/doc/todo/latex.mdwn
index 04eacbad41bef77c1df2a8452c5320493a27d8aa..01d927552850db2306ac3c29179c61e6cd35676b 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/todo/latex.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/latex.mdwn
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 How about a plugin adding a
-[[preprocessor_directive|preprocessordirective]] to render some given LaTeX
+[[preprocessor_directive|ikiwiki/preprocessordirective]] to render some given LaTeX
 and include it in the page?  This could either render the LaTeX as a PNG via
 [[debpkg dvipng]] and include the resulting image in the page, or perhaps
 render via [HeVeA](http://pauillac.inria.fr/~maranget/hevea/index.html),
@@ -167,27 +167,52 @@ Okay, the last version of the tex plugin for ikiwiki can be downloaded [here](ht
 > fixed a bug (the first time it was run, it tried to write the png file
 > before the teximages/ directory existed) and checked the result in.
 > 
-> Can you please flesh out [[plugins/tex]] with
+> Can you please flesh out [[plugins/teximg]] with
 > whatever documentation people who know tex will expect to see?
->
+
+Okay, I'll fill this up today I think with information about the plugin
+
+Done. Is that docu fine with you?
+
+>> Perhaps add some documentation about the kind of tex code that can be
+>> used, or a link to some documentation so people who don't know latex
+>> well can figure this out?
+
 > Also, please review my changes. In particular, I changed the @badthings
 > array to use qr//, which is much clearer, but it needs to be tested that
 > I didn't break the checking code when I did it. It would be nice to write
 > a test case that tries to feed it bad code and makes sure it rejects it.
+
+I'll test this now on my server. I'll report here later.
+Okay, checked. it works fine. My blacklist tests were successfull.
+
 >
 > Does it really make sense to have an alt tag for the image
 > that contains the tex code? Will that make any sense when browsing
 > without images?
-> 
+
+Mh.. For people who know latex very well this would be enough to imagine how the image would look like. 
+This are of course the minority of people (but I guess also the minority of people are using non-gui browsers).
+
+
+
 > I'm thinking about renameing the preprocessor directive to teximg.
 > \[[teximg code="" alt="foo"]] makes sense.. Would it make sense to rename
 > the whole plugin, or do you think that other tex stuff should go in this
 > same plugin?
->
+
+I'll think over this until I'm at work ;) Only for rendering images... not for generating .tex files .../wiki/
+the name is all the same i think. If you like teximg better than switch :)
+
+
 > Note: I removed the style= attribute, since as I've told you, the
 > htmlsanitizer strips those since they can be used to insert javascript. I
 > put in a class=teximage instead; the style sheet could be modified to
 > style that, if you want to send a patch for that.
+
+Ah yes.. sorry forgot to update the plugin in my public_html folder %-). This was my last change in this plugin :) Sorry.
+
+
 > 
 > --[[Joey]]