clarify which case fails

[ikiwiki.git] / doc / bugs / __91____91____33__inline_postform__61__no__93____93___doesn__39__t_disable_it.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/bugs/__91____91____33__inline_postform__61__no__93____93___doesn__39__t_disable_it.mdwn b/doc/bugs/__91____91____33__inline_postform__61__no__93____93___doesn__39__t_disable_it.mdwn
index adb4bb3300915c155313333140548a43b51f0fe7..7e7548657812fdac4b3d18dd48478a6b9259483c 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/bugs/__91____91____33__inline_postform__61__no__93____93___doesn__39__t_disable_it.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/__91____91____33__inline_postform__61__no__93____93___doesn__39__t_disable_it.mdwn
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+[[!tag patch users/smcv/ready]]
+[[!template id=gitbranch branch=smcv/ready/postform-no
+author="[[Simon McVittie|smcv]]"
+browse=http://git.pseudorandom.co.uk/smcv/ikiwiki.git/shortlog/refs/heads/ready/postform-no]]
+
 The [[ikiwiki/directive/inline]] directive generates a form if
 it has either rootpage, or postform with a "yes-like" value. This
 means that
@@ -6,3 +11,13 @@ means that
 
 does have a form. I would expect it not to (although
 mentioning rootpage there is useless).
+
+See also [[forum/How_to_disable_"Add_a_new_post_titled:"_submission_form?]].
+
+My `ready/postform-no` branch also contains a trivial regression test for
+`inline`. So far the only thing it really tests is that this bug was fixed,
+not the actual inlining of pages, but it's a start.
+
+--[[smcv]]
+
+>> this looks simple, straightforward and good to me --[[chrysn]]