update about openids and admin powers

[ikiwiki.git] / doc / todo / preprocessor_directive_for_proposed_changes.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/todo/preprocessor_directive_for_proposed_changes.mdwn b/doc/todo/preprocessor_directive_for_proposed_changes.mdwn
index d38ca87f918710a633c79726eaf6d336ec77eb89..e73e6c09ef970096ab8751d9feac1bebd9bb3af5 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/todo/preprocessor_directive_for_proposed_changes.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/preprocessor_directive_for_proposed_changes.mdwn
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ which can't be made through the web interface:
 
 Of course in these cases, you can add your request to a discussion page
 and wait for someone with the access/confidence to apply them.
-Maybe this can be enhanced with a [[PreprocessorDirective]]:
+Maybe this can be enhanced with a [[ikiwiki/PreprocessorDirective]]:
 
 <pre>
 \[[suggest op=merge dstfile=trunk srcfile=branches/jk oldrev=1234 newrev=1342]]
@@ -24,20 +24,37 @@ Index: IkiWiki/CGI.pm
 """]]
 </pre>
 
-These would expand to a description of the changes to be effected, a toggleable diff
-of them if appropriate, and of course an "apply theses changes" button.
-Ultimately my planned [[review_mechanism]] would manage pages with such directives
-by itself.
+These would expand to a description of the changes,
+and provide "apply theses changes", "preview changes", and maybe
+"show diff" buttons. When those would be clicked,
+an rcs_ function would be called to apply the changes in
+the working copy, and depending on the request they would
+be svn diff'ed or rendered and shown, and kept.
+(all the affected pages would be inlined for the preview)
+
+Ultimately my planned [[review_mechanism]] would manage pages
+with such directives by itself.
+
+Thinking about it, describing changes inside a directive rather
+than as pages of their own is a bad remedy for the temporary
+lack of web-based file upload in ikiwiki.
+
+Implementing this as new pages formats would be simpler,
+and combined with inlining and file uploading it would be
+at least as powerful. It would be easier to handle changes
+automatically (for instance, moving the change pages once
+they have been applied). There would still be associated
+discussion pages in markdown.
+
+Regular pages could be used as change pages as well,
+if they provide subpages in a format describing changes.
+This would allow grouping and documenting changes.
 
 I'm still uncertain about many things, so please anyone feel free to comment.
 Specifically:
 
-  * What would an optimal syntax look like?
-  * Do I need to / should I define a new rcs_ function to handle such operations?
-  * Would it be acceptable for an ikiwiki module to use temporary file (ie. to calculate diffs)?
-  * Should the diff be calculated at page build time (which means the page should be rebuilt
-    whenever a target file changes), or should the CGI be used when someone requests it?
-  * Would it be possible to detect already applied changes (without extra state, that is),
-    and propose to "revert changes" in that case?
+  * Would it be possible to detect already applied changes
+    (without extra state, that is), and propose to "revert
+    changes" in that case?
 
 --[[JeremieKoenig]]