It depends on the Perl `Locale::Po4a::Po` library (`apt-get install po4a`).
+[[!toc]]
+
Introduction
============
Security checks
---------------
-- Can any sort of directives be put in po files that will
- cause mischief (ie, include other files, run commands, crash gettext,
- whatever).
-- Any security issues on running po4a on untrusted content?
+### Security history
+
+The only past security issues I could find in GNU gettext and po4a
+are:
+
+- [CVE-2004-0966](http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2004-0966),
+ *i.e.* [Debian bug #278283](http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=278283):
+ the autopoint and gettextize scripts in the GNU gettext package
+ 1.14 and later versions, as used in Trustix Secure Linux 1.5
+ through 2.1 and other operating systems, allows local users to
+ overwrite files via a symlink attack on temporary files.
+- [CVE-2007-4462](http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-4462):
+ `lib/Locale/Po4a/Po.pm` in po4a before 0.32 allows local users to
+ overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on the
+ gettextization.failed.po temporary file.
+
+**FIXME**: check whether this plugin would have been a possible attack
+vector to exploit these vulnerabilities.
+
+Depending on my mood, the lack of found security issues can either
+indicate that there are none, or reveal that no-one ever bothered to
+find (and publish) them.
+
+### PO file features
+
+Can any sort of directives be put in po files that will cause mischief
+(ie, include other files, run commands, crash gettext, whatever)?
+
+> No [documented](http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/gettext.html#PO-Files)
+> directive is supposed to do so.
+
+### Running po4a on untrusted content
+
+Are there any security issues on running po4a on untrusted content?
+
+> To say the least, this issue is not well covered, at least publicly:
+>
+> - the documentation does not talk about it;
+> - grep'ing the source code for `security` or `trust` gives no answer.
+>
+> I'll ask their opinion to the po4a maintainers.
+>
+> I'm not in a position to audit the code, but I had a look anyway:
+>
+> - no use of `system()`, `exec()` or backticks in `Locale::Po4a`; are
+> there any other way to run external programs in Perl?
+> - a symlink attack vulnerability was already discovered, so I "hope"
+> the code has been checked to find some more already
+> - the po4a parts we are using themselves use the following Perl
+> modules: `DynaLoader`, `Encode`, `Encode::Guess`,
+> `Text::WrapI18N`, `Locale::gettext` (`bindtextdomain`,
+> `textdomain`, `gettext`, `dgettext`)
+>
+> --[[intrigeri]]
+
+### Fuzzing input
+
+I was not able to find any public information about gettext or po4a
+having been tested with a fuzzing program, such as `zzuf` or `fusil`.
+Moreover, some gettext parsers seem to be quite
+[easy to crash](http://fusil.hachoir.org/trac/browser/trunk/fuzzers/fusil-gettext),
+so it might be useful to bang gettext/po4a's heads against such
+a program in order to easily detect some of the most obvious DoS.
+[[--intrigeri]]
gettext/po4a rough corners
--------------------------
live in different directories): say bla.fr.po has been updated in
repo2; pulling repo2 from repo1 seems to trigger a PO update, that
changes bla.fr.po in repo1; then pushing repo1 to repo2 triggers
- a PO update, that changes bla.fr.po in repo2; etc.; fixed in
- `629968fc89bced6727981c0a1138072631751fee`?
+ a PO update, that changes bla.fr.po in repo2; etc.; quickly fixed in
+ `629968fc89bced6727981c0a1138072631751fee`, by disabling references
+ in Pot files. Using `Locale::Po4a::write_if_needed` might be
+ a cleaner solution.
- new translations created in the web interface must get proper
charset/encoding gettext metadata, else the next automatic PO update
removes any non-ascii chars; possible solution: put such metadata
[[bugs/pagetitle_function_does_not_respect_meta_titles]], which might
be fixed by something like [[todo/using_meta_titles_for_parentlinks]].
-### backlinks
-
-#### `po_link_to = negotiated`
-
-If a given translatable `sourcepage.mdwn` links to \[[destpage]],
-`sourcepage.LL.po` also link to \[[destpage]], and the latter has the
-master page *and* all its translations listed in the backlinks. On the
-other hand, translations of `destpage` get none of these backlinks.
-What would be nice is:
-
-- if a translatable page links to another translatable page: the
- master destpage gets a backlink to the master sourcepage, and every
- slave destpage gets a backlink to the corresponding slave sourcepage
-- if a translatable page links to a non-translatable page: the
- destpage gets a backlink to the master sourcepage only
-- if a non-translatable page links to a translatable page: every
- master or slave destpage gets a backlink to the sourcepage
-- if a non-translatable page links to another non-translatable page:
- the default behavious is nice, don't change it
-
-#### `po_link_to = current`
-
-At first glance, backlinks seem to work nicely, but a more thorough
-look is needed.
-
-#### `po_link_to = default`
+### source files format
-FIXME
+Markdown is supported, great, but what about others? The set of file
+formats supported both in ikiwiki and po4a probably is greater than
+`{markdown}`.
Translation quality assurance
-----------------------------
sipb-www / ikiwiki.git / blobdiff